HADDOCK

Melanogrammus aeglefinus


Assessment report
Published by

Marine and Freshwater Research Institute, Iceland

Published

12 June 2026

Key signals

  • Survey biomass steadily increased from 2011, peaking sharply in 2023–2025 at levels similar to the peak observed in 2003–2006.

  • High recruitment from 2020–2022 is the primary driver behind the current biomass peak. However, recruitment in 2023 and 2024 has fallen below the decade’s average, while 2025 recruitment estimates are near this average. The earliest signs of 2026 recruitment are high, indicating likely increases in the future.

  • Length distributions have remained stable over the past decade, reflecting consistent periodic recruitment and a broad range of sizes currently present in the stock.

  • Despite a sharp decrease in reference biomass from last year, current biomass estimates from the stock assessment are one of the highest recorded since 1979, though these estimates carry considerable uncertainty.

  • Harvest rates have generally fluctuated around the target harvest rate set over the last decade, with no major deviations.

General information

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) is abundant in the coastal waters around Iceland and is mostly limited to the Icelandic continental shelf. Haddock is predominantly distributed around Iceland’s western and southern coasts, typically in depths between 10 and 200 meters. Historically, spawning activity has been restricted to southern waters. Recently, an increasing proportion of the fishable stock has been observed off the northern coast compared to previous decades.

Fishery

Catch per unit of effort from commercial fisheries

Catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) from hauls where haddock comprise more than 50% of the catch show a steady increase in CPUE since 1990 across the main gear types (Figure 7). CPUE levels from bottom trawls and demersal seine are among the highest recorded in the time series, whereas those from longlines remain relatively low. This trend aligns with fishers’ perception that haddock are easy to catch. However, this pattern differs from that observed in surveys and stock assessments, which show less of an increase after 2000 and a more pronounced decline in recent years.

It is important to note that these differences may partly reflect changes in the size composition of the stock. The biomass of haddock ≥60 cm is currently at the highest observed level in the time series, while total biomass is near its long-term average. This suggests that CPUE trends may be more reflective of the abundance of larger individuals rather than overall stock size.

Regional differences in CPUE are also evident. In the area north of Iceland, CPUE has shown a continuous increase, whereas in southern regions it more closely mirrors the biomass trends observed in the spring survey. Bycatch is minimal, as haddock are typically targeted in species-specific catch compositions.

CPUE could not be estimated for 2022 due to the unavailability of effort data at the time of assessment.

Figure 7: Haddock in 5a. Catch per unit of effort in the most important gear types. The dashed lines are based on locations where more than 50% of the catch is haddock and solid lines on all records where haddock is caught. A change occurred in the longline fleet starting September 1999. Earlier only vessels larger than 10 BRT were required to return logbooks but later all vessels were required to return logbooks. Effort data is not available for 2022.

Landings and discards

Historical landings data come from various databases.

Historical landings data are sourced from various databases such as ICES STATLAN database, Directorate of Fisheries and the Icelandic Coast Guard.

Icelandic law prohibits discarding, and discard rates since 2001 have been low, generally below 3% of the total annual landings, both in weight and numbers (Figure 8, also see MRI (2016) for further details). Fisheries management regulations effectively discourage discarding through quota flexibility and quota conversion measures. In addition to prevent high grading and quota mismatch the fisheries are allowed to land fish that will not be accounted for in the allotted quota, provided that the proceedings when the landed catch is sold will go to the Fisheries Project Fund (Verkefnasjóður sjávarútvegsins).

Figure 8: Haddock in 5a. Estimates of annual discards by gear (point estimate and 95% confidence interval). No estimates are available since 2018.

Data and sampling

Commercial data

Sampling from commercial catches is generally comprehensive, covering the main gears (demersal seines, longlines, and trawls) and adequately representing the spatial and seasonal distribution of catches (Figure 9 and Figure 10). An overview of the sampled otoliths is provided in Table 3.

Figure 9: Haddock in 5a. Ratio of samples by month (bars) compared with proportion landings by month (solid black line) split by year and main gear types. Numbers of above the bars indicate number of samples by year, month and gear.
Figure 10: Haddock in 5a. Fishing grounds last year as reported in logbooks (contours) and positions of samples taken from landings (crosses) by main gear types.

Length compositions

Commercial catches primarily consist of haddock ranging from 40 to 70 cm, a range that has remained stable in recent years (Figure 11). Gillnet fisheries tend to target slightly larger individuals, and the modes of the length distributions vary more markedly depending on the presence of larger haddock.

Most length measurements are derived from the three main fleet segments: trawl, longline, and demersal seine fisheries (Table 2). The number of length samples collected by gear type has fluctuated in recent years, reflecting shifts in fleet composition.