Bottom trawl
|
Longlines
|
Gillnets
|
Demersal seine
|
Total released | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vessels | Number released | Vessels | Number released | Vessels | Number released | Vessels | Number released | ||
2017 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 472 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 473 |
2018 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2044 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2051 |
2019 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 2214 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 2312 |
2020 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2480 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 2516 |
2021 | 1 | 10 | 14 | 7723 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 66 | 7799 |
2022 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2536 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 2550 |
2023 | 6 | 43 | 22 | 882 | 8 | 13 | 2 | 242 | 1180 |
2024 | 12 | 64 | 20 | 1046 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 164 | 1289 |
Key signals
Halibut fisheries peaked early in the 20th century, declining significantly since 1960; since 2012, targeted fishing is banned, and release of all viable individuals is mandatory.
Atlantic halibut stock indices have remained low since 1990 but slightly improved recently, with the 2024 recruitment being the highest since 1988; indices indicate growth in spawning stock since 2020.
General information
Atlantic halibut is the largest of all flatfish species and the largest bony fish caught around Iceland. The largest recorded halibut caught in Icelandic waters measured 365 cm and weighed 266 kg, captured north of Iceland in 1935. Halibut matures slowly; approximately half of males mature at around 80 cm and half of females at 103 cm. Halibut is found all around Iceland but is most prominent west and south of the country. It is a bottom-dwelling species inhabiting sandy, muddy, rocky, and even hard bottoms down to depths of 2000 m. Juveniles occupy shallow waters until 3–5 years of age, after which halibut gradually moves deeper and farther offshore. Halibut is known for extensive migrations; individuals tagged in Icelandic waters have been recaptured near the Faroe Islands, East and West Greenland, and Newfoundland. Likewise, halibut recovered in Icelandic waters have previously been tagged in the Faroes and Canada.
Fishery
Halibut fisheries were intensive in the 20th century, and catch data from Icelandic waters indicate that the species is sensitive to heavy fishing pressure (Figure 1). After peaks in catches were reached, often within very short periods, catches quickly declined. For example, the halibut stock recovered during the fishing ban of the war years when fishing activity around Iceland was limited. When fisheries resumed, catches rapidly peaked within a few years but declined sharply thereafter.
The highest halibut catches in Icelandic waters occurred in 1907, reaching nearly 8 000 tonnes, and in several other instances ranged between 6 000 and 7 000 tonnes (Figure 1). Since about 1960, annual halibut catches have steadily declined. Between 2004 and 2007, annual catches ranged from 527 to 683 tonnes, mainly caught by bottom trawls and longlines. Annual catches from 2008 to 2011 were slightly under 600 tonnes, with an increasing proportion caught by longlines due to intensified targeted fishing efforts. Since 2012, when a ban on targeted fishing was enacted and requirements to release all viable halibut were introduced, reported catches have ranged between 36 and 200 tonnes. Catches from 2022–2024 have been approximately 200 tonnes annually, mostly taken by bottom trawls.
The distribution of halibut fishing effort has changed over the past r tyr-2012 years due to the 2011 ban on targeted fishing and directives to release all viable halibut (Figure 2). Between 2000 and 2011, halibut were mainly caught west of Iceland, according to logbook data (Figure 3). After the ban, halibut fishing shifted from the western continental shelf to bottom trawl grounds northwest of Iceland.
Targeted fishing for halibut using longlines with hooks occurred at depths greater than 300 meters (Figure 4). Halibut are now caught at shallower depths, mostly by bottom trawls.
Historically, halibut was primarily caught using longlines with hooks and bottom trawls, accounting for approximately 85% of landed halibut catches (Figure 5, Table 1). Since 2011, almost no halibut has been landed from longlines (Table 1), mainly because most halibut caught by this method are viable and thus released. The number of released viable halibut increased from 2018 until 2021, when approximately 7 800 individuals were released (Table 2). Since then, releases have decreased, particularly from longline fisheries.
Year |
Catch (tonnes)
|
Vessels (numbers)
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bottom trawl | Demersal sein | Longline | Other gears | Total catch | Bottom trawlers | Demersal seiners | Longliners | Other vessels | Total | |
1993 | 340 | 96 | 248 | 75 | 759 | 265 | 78 | 420 | 466 | 1229 |
1994 | 306 | 151 | 279 | 96 | 831 | 257 | 101 | 491 | 476 | 1325 |
1995 | 243 | 116 | 206 | 45 | 609 | 225 | 100 | 460 | 404 | 1189 |
1996 | 309 | 173 | 253 | 50 | 785 | 187 | 113 | 411 | 401 | 1112 |
1997 | 275 | 104 | 194 | 45 | 619 | 169 | 107 | 314 | 347 | 937 |
1998 | 197 | 74 | 214 | 32 | 517 | 161 | 98 | 329 | 314 | 902 |
1999 | 199 | 110 | 222 | 29 | 561 | 155 | 87 | 347 | 272 | 861 |
2000 | 202 | 85 | 171 | 38 | 496 | 137 | 79 | 349 | 283 | 848 |
2001 | 216 | 95 | 255 | 62 | 628 | 136 | 85 | 348 | 346 | 915 |
2002 | 245 | 116 | 272 | 48 | 681 | 129 | 81 | 309 | 323 | 842 |
2003 | 215 | 141 | 202 | 72 | 631 | 126 | 88 | 320 | 304 | 838 |
2004 | 215 | 94 | 218 | 42 | 569 | 118 | 84 | 331 | 287 | 820 |
2005 | 221 | 54 | 205 | 41 | 521 | 119 | 79 | 327 | 213 | 738 |
2006 | 176 | 38 | 228 | 21 | 464 | 107 | 73 | 319 | 162 | 661 |
2007 | 177 | 39 | 187 | 26 | 429 | 107 | 68 | 295 | 122 | 592 |
2008 | 191 | 46 | 242 | 19 | 498 | 97 | 63 | 252 | 97 | 509 |
2009 | 164 | 47 | 298 | 19 | 529 | 92 | 61 | 235 | 120 | 508 |
2010 | 126 | 34 | 386 | 14 | 559 | 84 | 50 | 207 | 154 | 495 |
2011 | 88 | 24 | 423 | 12 | 548 | 79 | 47 | 195 | 174 | 495 |
2012 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 35 | 54 | 9 | 33 | 26 | 122 |
2013 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 41 | 67 | 21 | 46 | 28 | 162 |
2014 | 33 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 45 | 60 | 17 | 61 | 32 | 170 |
2015 | 72 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 84 | 63 | 18 | 33 | 18 | 132 |
2016 | 113 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 119 | 70 | 17 | 11 | 23 | 121 |
2017 | 84 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 102 | 67 | 25 | 8 | 22 | 122 |
2018 | 115 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 133 | 64 | 29 | 8 | 27 | 128 |
2019 | 103 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 128 | 59 | 30 | 12 | 24 | 125 |
2020 | 120 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 142 | 64 | 29 | 11 | 22 | 126 |
2021 | 134 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 153 | 63 | 30 | 6 | 31 | 130 |
2022 | 152 | 17 | 23 | 3 | 194 | 62 | 27 | 14 | 29 | 132 |
2023 | 137 | 17 | 19 | 3 | 176 | 55 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 129 |
2024 | 154 | 22 | 16 | 5 | 197 | 58 | 28 | 12 | 25 | 123 |
Sampling overview
Sampling of biological information of Atlantic halibut from the commercial catch is not considered good (Table 3). Few samples are taken each years and in some years no samples have been taken. Samples have not been taken since 2021.
Bottom trawl
|
Demersal seine
|
Longline
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Samples | Length measured | Samples | Length measured | Samples | Length measured | |
1994 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 122 | 0 | 0 |
1995 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 63 |
1996 | 1 | 27 | 2 | 249 | 0 | 0 |
1997 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 57 | 1 | 1 |
1998 | 51 | 215 | 2 | 199 | 8 | 104 |
1999 | 63 | 309 | 1 | 83 | 1 | 26 |
2000 | 24 | 86 | 2 | 168 | 2 | 31 |
2001 | 2 | 30 | 1 | 76 | 0 | 0 |
2002 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2003 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
2004 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
2007 | 3 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 65 |
2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 |
2011 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2012 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2013 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
2019 | 11 | 60 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
2020 | 6 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Icelandic survey data
Atlantic halibut is monitored in the Icelandic Groundfish Surveys both in spring and autumn. The spring groundfish survey (IS-SMB), conducted primarily within 500 m depth, has been ongoing since 1985. Juvenile halibut are common in this area, and catches in the IS-SMB mostly comprise immature individuals aged 3–6 years. In contrast, the autumn groundfish survey (IS-SMH), running since 1996, tends to capture larger halibut, as towing occurs at greater depths. IS-SMB captures fluctuations in numbers and biomass of immature halibut more effectively than IS-SMH due to its longer time series and lower uncertainty in index estimates. Therefore, advisory provided by the Marine and Freshwater Research Institute (MFRI) primarily relies on IS-SMB data. However, neither survey adequately covers areas inhabited by mature halibut, making them insufficient for accurately assessing spawning stock size.
Results from IS-SMB show that the total stock index (by weight) declined sharply from 1985 to 1990 and has remained low since then (Figure 6). Between 2008–2014, this index was at its lowest recorded level but has since increased. The 2025 index is about one-third of the peak observed in 1985. On the other hand, the index for large halibut (>86 cm) has increased significantly since 2020 in both IS-SMB and IS-SMH, suggesting growth in the spawning stock.
The total index by number provides a clearer picture of stock development than biomass indices (Figure 6), mainly due to the influence of large halibut on biomass calculations, especially in IS-SMH. In IS-SMB, the total index by number in 2025 was only about 5% of the 1985 value. The number index from IS-SMH has remained low and aligns well with IS-SMB observations.
As previously mentioned, halibut caught in IS-SMB mainly comprises immature individuals aged 3–6 years. These age groups have been in a prolonged decline for over three decades. The last significant recruitment wave, with several large year classes in succession, occurred from 1980 to 1984, implying that the spawning stock was above the minimum size until 1980. The last notably abundant year class on the continental shelf was from 1990 (Figure 6). In 2024, the recruitment index (<30 cm) recorded in IS-SMB was the highest since 1988.
Figure 7 shows relative indices from IS-SMB and IS-SMH, indicating little difference between the two surveys in terms of total biomass and total numbers.
Small halibut (30–60 cm) dominates in IS-SMB, whereas length distribution in IS-SMH is broader and without clear patterns (Figure 8).
Halibut is mainly found northwest and west of Iceland in IS-SMB (Figure 9). From 2002 to 2010, halibut was also notably present in southeastern areas. In IS-SMH, catches of halibut are generally sparse but, when they occur, are usually northwest and west of Iceland (Figure 9).